Chicago has been home to key Hamas operatives for more than 20 years. It was home to the Islamic Association for Palestine, which served as the terrorist organization’s American propaganda arm. It was home to Mohammed Salah and Abdelhaleem al-Ashqar, both of whom were key Hamas financiers.
Now, Mayor Rahm Emmanuel has turned to a key cog in the wheel of domestic Hamas support for a new city panel aimed at making the city more immigrant friendly.
Ahmed Rehab, the head of the local Council on American-Islamic Relations’ (CAIR) Chicago chapter, is among 50 people appointed last week to the mayor’s “New Americans Advisory Committee.” The committee is charged with developing “a roadmap that will ensure Chicago continues to thrive and grow and attracts the world’s leading human capital to compete in the 21st century global economy and beyond.”
Emmanuel should know better.
He was White House chief of staff when it became known that the FBI had broken off communication with CAIR in 2008 over concerns about the organization’s roots in a Hamas-support network. CAIR founders Omar Ahmad and Nihad Awad are included in a telephone list of “Palestine Committee” members (Ahmad is identified as “Omar Yehya”), and CAIR was listed in internal records as a specific committee arm.
Other internal records show that the Palestine Committee was created by the Muslim Brotherhood to help Hamas “with what it needs of media, money, men and all of that.”
An FBI official wrote to inquiring U.S. senators in 2009, explaining that “until we can resolve whether there continues to be a connection between CAIR or its executives and HAMAS, the FBI does not view CAIR as an appropriate liaison partner.”
Yet, Emmanuel appointed the head of the group’s Chicago office to the committee on immigrant policy.
Although none of the evidence cited by the FBI implicates Rehab specifically, he has established a record of echoing CAIR’s national leadership in refusing to condemn Hamas as a terrorist group and in reflexively opposing law enforcement counter-terrorism investigations.
Rehab defended Kifah Mustapha when the Illinois State Police revoked his appointment as a Muslim police chaplain. Prosecutors say Mustapha was part of the Palestine Committee. Records show he was a paid fundraiser for the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development, the Palestine Committee’s official fundraising arm.
Five former HLF officials were convicted in 2008 on more than 100 total counts related to illegally funneling more than $12 million to Hamas-tied charities in the West Bank and Gaza. Rehab dismissed the prosecution theory in the case as ludicrous and said the evidence amounted to nothing more than “textbook guilt by association.”
But U.S. District Judge Jorge Solis, who saw all the testimony and evidence, came to a different conclusion. “The purpose of creating the Holy Land Foundation was as a fundraising arm for Hamas,” he said during a sentencing hearing.
In a separate ruling, Solis found that the prosecution provided “ample evidence” tying CAIR and other organizations to Hamas.
Rehab paid no attention to those court exhibits in criticizing the case, and later in criticizing the state’s decision to rescind Mustapha’s appointment for the chaplain position. Instead, he blamed the messenger, the Investigative Project on Terrorism, for exposing Mustapha’s connections.
“Our concern is that the Illinois State Police is kowtowing to articles online published by notorious anti-Muslims who have been in the business of smearing Muslim activists leaders and Imams for the longest time,” Rehab said. Mustapha is “a man of great integrity.”
Condemns Terror Investigations, Not Terrorists
That’s not the first time Rehab stood stubbornly behind people tied to Hamas support despite the available evidence.
During a 2007 town hall gathering in Texas, he accused the government of a “political persecution” of Muhammad Salah, who admitted to Israeli authorities in 1995 that he was a Hamas member. Though the United States designated Salah as a terrorist, Rehab described him as “a decent individual” and a “man we hold dear.”
In a column, Rehab said Salah merely “supplied charitable aid to the most vulnerable factions of his occupied and war-ravaged country of origin, Palestine.”
Rehab offered a similar argument during a 2006 interview with the BBC in which he refused to condemn Hamas as a terrorist organization. He does condemn “the blowing up of Tel Aviv pizzerias or cafes,” he said, but not “the hospitals run by Hamas, or the schools that help children learn.”
That argument, that a terrorist organization’s social wings can be considered separately from its terrorist branch, was rejected by the U.S. Supreme Court in a 2010 decision that found support for non-violent programs run by terrorist groups “frees up other resources within the organization that may be put to violent ends. It also importantly helps lend legitimacy to foreign terrorist groups—legitimacy that makes it easier for those groups to persist, to recruit members, and to raise funds—all of which facilitate more terrorist attacks.”
Last month, Rehab went on national television to condemn the New York Police Department’s surveillance activities within Muslim communities. The work was almost entirely conducted in public venues – on streets and open Internet sites – but during an appearance on “The O’Reilly Factor” to discuss a lawsuit against the NYPD, Rehab invoked purported wiretaps and “illegal spying activity” that was never alleged in a series of media reports on the department.
“First of all, this program is unconstitutional,” he said. “It’s also un-American. Essentially, the pilgrims crossed an ocean to avoid this kind of religious harassment, as one of the plaintiffs actually said. And, you know, this program was targeting individuals and essentially the entire community; restaurants, businesses, mosques, cab drivers, veterans, school groups. They weren’t going after criminal leads as law enforcement ought to do, or after suspicious leads, but rather, [an] entire community based solely on religious affiliation and political opinions.”
His comments came three weeks after New Jersey Attorney General Jeffrey Chiesa announced that his review of the program found no laws had been broken. That result satisfied Gov. Chris Christie, who initially expressed anger that the NYPD surveillance crossed into his state. “If that’s what [Chiesa] determined, Christie said, “it’s good enough for me.”
A week after that, and two weeks before Rehab’s comments, outgoing NYPD director of intelligence analysis Mitchell Silber blasted media coverage of the surveillance program for using “cherry-picked and misconstrued examples to support particularly damaging charges.” The program helps police identify pockets of radical activity where terror plots might take root.
The same tactics are used to stop everyday criminal networks, from drug dealers and gangs to human trafficking, Silber wrote.
Surveillance of public places is part of court-approved guidelines, he wrote, and anything involving undercover officers was done “only on the basis of a lead or investigation reviewed and authorized in writing at the highest levels of the department” (emphasis original).
Read more at IPT
By Neil Munro
