Homeland Security guidelines advise deference to pro-Shariah Muslim supremacists

images (41)

By Charles C. Johnson:

The Department of Homeland Security, which under Secretary Janet Napolitano has shown a keen interest in monitoring and warning about outspoken conservatives, takes a very different approach in monitoring political Islamists, according to a 2011 memo on protecting the free speech rights of pro-Shariah Muslim supremacists.

In a checklist obtained by The Daily Caller entitled “Countering Violent Extremism Dos and Don’ts” the DHS’s Office of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties notifies local and national law enforcement officials that it is Obama administration policy to consider specifically Islamic criticism of the American system of government legitimate.

This policy stands in stark contrast to the DHS Office of Intelligence and Analysis’ 2009 memo “Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment” [pdf], which warned of the dangers posed by pro-life advocates, critics of same-sex marriage and groups concerned with abiding by the U.S. Constitution, among others.

The advice of the Dos and Don’ts list is far more conciliatory. “Don’t use training that equates radical thought, religious expression, freedom to protest, or other constitutionally-protected activity, including disliking the U.S. government without being violent,” the manual’s authors write in a section on training being “sensitive to constitutional values.”

The manual, which was produced by an inter-agency working group from DHS and the National Counterterrorism Center, advises, “Trainers who equate the desire for Sharia law with criminal activity violate basic tenets of the First Amendment.”

The checklist also advised against using moderate Muslim “trainers who are self-professed ‘Muslim reformers’” because they “may further an interest group agenda instead of delivering generally accepted, unbiased information.”

The manual advises trainees not to assume Muslim Americans are “using democratic processes, like litigation and free speech, to subvert democracy and install Sharia law.”

Read more at Daily Caller

 

 

Special Travel Benefit for Saudis a “Slap in the Face”

IPT News
March 20, 2013

The Obama Doctrine and Countering Violent Extremism Strategy – A Product of Islamist Influence Operations

terrorist-painted-on-wall-630x286

December 1, 2012, by Dr. Richard Swier

As Raess Alam Qazi and Sheheryar Alam Qazi, two Muslim men from Pakistan, are indicted in Florida for plotting to carry out a terrorist attack using a weapon of mass destruction it is time to analyse the Obama Doctrine on terrorism.

On August 3, 2011 President Obama released the National Strategy on Empowering Local Partners to Prevent Violent Extremism. The strategy, now known as the Obama Doctrine, was based upon the Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) study group findings and recommendation developed in 2010 by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The CVE has become the blueprint for both domestic and foreign policy when dealing with terrorism. The Obama Doctrine redefined “terrorism” as “violent extremism”.

The DHS website states, “The threat posed by violent extremism is neither constrained by international borders nor limited to any single ideology. Groups and individuals inspired by a range of religious, political, or other ideological beliefs have promoted and used violence against the homeland.”

Who developed the Obama Doctrine?

The Obama Doctrine is based in large part upon the 2010 findings and recommendations of a Department of Homeland Security’s Advisory Council. The twenty member advisory council is unique in its composition, with eight members who are Islamists, three representing large Islamic communities and one openly supportive of Islam.

Islamist members included: Nimco Ahmed, Policy Aide, Vice-President of the Minneapolis City Council, Omar Alomari Community Engagement Officer, Ohio Homeland Security, Asli Bali Acting Professor of Law, UCLA School of Law, Mohamed Elibiary President and CEO, The Freedom and Justice Foundation, Amin Kosseim Deputy Inspector, New York City Police Department, Imam Mohamed Magid Executive Director, All Dulles Area Muslim Society (ADAMS Center), Asim Rehman President, Muslim Bar Association of New York and Dalia Mogahed Senior Analyst and Executive Director, Gallup Center for Muslim Studies

Members from predominantly Islamist communities included: Michael Downing Deputy Chief, Commanding Officer, Counter Terrorism and Criminal Intelligence Bureau, Los Angeles Police Department and Ronald Haddad Chief of Police, Dearborn Police Department. Richard Cohen President and CEO, Southern Poverty Law Center, was a pro-Islamist council member. Pro-Islamist subject matter experts advising the council included: Arif Alikhan Assistant Secretary, Policy Development, DHS and Laurie WoodAnalyst, Southern Poverty Law Center/Instructor, Federal Law Enforcement Training Center.

According to Clare Lopez, former CIA Operations Officer and co-Author of the book Shariah: The Threat to America:

“Muhammad Magid is not only the head of the ADAMS center, he is the son of the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) Grand Mufti of Sudan and current president of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), an MB front group named by the Department of Justice as an unindicted co-conspirator in the 2008 Holy Land Foundation – HAMAS (HLF) terror funding trial. Magid is also one of the closest advisers of the National Security Council of the USA (in particular Denis McDonough). He’s an A-list invitee at the White House. Some believe he may be the head of the North American MB Shura Council.

Mohamed Elibiary is affiliated with numerous identified MB figures who are members of the Freedom and Justice Foundation Advisory Council: they come from the Muslim American Society (MAS), CAIR, ISNA, and the Islamic Association of North Texas. He publicly criticized the HLF trial convictions and has written admiringly of Sayyed Qutb.

IIIT likewise is listed in the MB’s “Explanatory Memorandum” of 1991 as one of its ‘friends and the organizations of our friends’.”

The Obama Doctrine states, “Government officials and the American public should not stigmatize or blame communities because of the actions of a handful of individuals.” The doctrine notes, “This type of violent extremism is a complicated challenge for the United States, not only because of the threat of attacks, but also because of its potential to divide us.” The Obama Doctrine states, “Violent extremists prey on the disenchantment and alienation that discrimination creates, and they have a vested interest in anti-Muslim sentiment.”

Read more at WatchDogWire

Muslim Brotherhood in America, Part 9: Team Obama & the Islamist Agenda: (You can fast forward to 1:32 for the section on DHS and the Countering Violent Extremism policies but I recommend viewing the entire video)

Related:

Four Islamists on Gov. Christie’s Muslim Outreach Committee

by: Ryan Mauro

A RadicalIslam.org investigation has discovered that at least four Islamists sit on New Jersey Governor Chris Christie’s Muslim outreach committee, which was formed after Attorney General Jeffrey Chiesa concludedin May that NYPD intelligence-gathering operations in New Jersey did not break any laws.

All of the information about the Islamist backgrounds of these four committee members is publicly available, yet the Christie Administration picked them to serve as liaisons to the Muslim community of the state. As a result, they are having private meetings with N.J.’s top security officials. This is just the latest example of Christie’s embrace of Islamists that should be shunned, not exalted.

The discovery that the Islamists were on the committee was made when RadicalIslam.org obtained a previously unreleased list of committee members present at a September 5, 2012 meeting at the Leroy Smith Building in Newark.

The four committee members of concern are:

  • Imam Mohammad Qatanani, whose deportation is sought by the Department of Homeland Security for not disclosing on his green card application that he was arrested and convicted by Israel in 1993 for his involvement with Hamas;
  • Ahmed Shedeed, a fervent supporter of the Muslim Brotherhood and President of the Islamic Center of Jersey City, a mosque with a history of Islamist leadership. Its website currently contains disturbing statements about jihad, the West, wife beating and polygamy;
  • Mohammed Younes, the President of the American Muslim Union, a group with Islamist leadership and close ties to Qatanani’s mosque, which was founded by a Hamas fundraiser; and
  • Imam Abdul Basit of the New Brunswick Islamic Center, a mosque founded by a radical cleric. In July, it held a Brotherhood-linked seminar featuring multiple extremist speakers.

Addressing the committee were: Attorney General Chiesa, NJ State Police Superintendent Colonel Rick Fuentes and the Office of Homeland Security and Preparedness Director Edward Dickson. These addresses were followed by dialogue with committee members.

Other NJ officials that were present at the meeting were: First Assistant Attorney General Calcagni, Special Assistant Christopher Iu, Special Assistant Paul Salvatoriello, State Police Major Gerald Lewis and Office of Homeland Security and Preparedness Community Affairs Chief John Paige.

Profiles of the Four Islamist Committee Members

Imam Mohammad Qatanani

Imam Mohammad QatananiThe most notorious of the committee members is Mohammad Qatanani. He was arrested in Israel in 1993 because of his links to Hamas, including the fact that his brother-in-law was a Hamas official in the West Bank. Qatanani told the Israelis that he had been a member of the Jordanian Muslim Brotherhood but left in 1991 because he had limited time for this project. The Israeli government says he admitted to being a Hamas member and was convicted, but he was released as part of a plea bargain. The Department of Homeland Security is seeking his deportation for failing to disclose this on his green card application.

In 1994, Qatanani moved to NJ to lead the Islamic Center of Passaic County in Paterson, a mosque founded in 1989 by Hamas fundraiser Mohammed El-Mezain. In November 1994, El-Mezain stated that ICPC was collecting money for Hamas, according to an FBI report. The two men jointly led the ICPC and lived together as El-Mezain raised money for terrorism until he stepped down in 1999. In July 2006, the Department of Homeland Security began deportation proceedings against Qatanani.

The DHS says Qatanani “engaged in terrorist activity” and is guilty of “material misrepresentation” and “engaging in unauthorized employment … by allowing an out-of-status alien to reside with him.” It also describes a “highly dubious” transfer of thousands of dollars to the West Bank.

“It is certainly suspicious when a person who has been convicted of being a member of, and providing services, to Hamas, who has personal ties to a Hamas militant leader, and a Hamas fundraiser also sends undisclosed cash to the West Bank,” the 2008 DHS court filing states.

Qatanani is the only Hamas supporter identified by name in a July 2008 NJ Office of Homeland Security and Preparedness intelligence report about the Hamas network in the state. His preaching between 2007 and 2009 reflected his radical views, as shown in translations made by the Investigative Project on Terrorism. For example, he prayed for the defeat of “occupation and oppression” in Iraq, Palestine and Chechnya in 2007. The enemies of Islam are the U.S., Israel and Russia in this context.

He also preached that Jews and Christians “will be swiftly punished by Allah” and that Muslims should not speak poorly of Sheikh Yousef al-Qaradawi, a top Muslim Brotherhood cleric that endorses suicide bombings and Hamas. He also defended donations to the families of suicide bombers. Just this September, Qatanani said the U.S. should outlaw criticism of Islam.

Under Qatanani’s leadership, the ICPC has held various Islamist speakers, such as Hamas-supporter Imam Reda Shata, Hamas-linked activist Abdelhaleem Ashqar (who is now in prison for refusing to testify about the Hamas network in the U.S.) and Wagdy Ghoneim, who was voluntarily deported from the country in 2005 for his terror ties and now preaches extremism in Egypt.

In April 2004, a former chairman of the ICPC’s board, Esam Omeish, praised Palestinians who “[understand] that the jihad way is the way to liberate your land,” pointing out the “beloved” founder of Hamas as an example to follow. He also supports the Muslim Brotherhood as a “moderate” force and once was the president of the Muslim American Society, a Brotherhood front. He also “likes” Sheikh Yousef al-Qaradawi on Facebook.

Despite this record, Christie defended Qatanani against the DHS in 2008, calling him  a “man of great goodwill.” His Assistant U.S. Attorney Charles McKenna was as a character witness for him during the trial. The immigration judge granted Qatanani permanent residency, but the Board of Immigration Appeals overturned the ruling. The next deportation hearing is scheduled for November 26.

In May, Attorney General Chiesa met with Qatanani after he cleared the NYPD of breaking state laws. On July 24, Qatanani attended an Iftar dinner at the Governor’s Mansion. During his address, Christie pointed out Qatanani, calling him a “friend” and attacking his critics as anti-Muslim “bigots.”

Mohammed Younes

The President of the American Muslim Union, Mohammed Younes, is also on the Muslim outreach committee. This organization is very closely tied to the Hamas-linked Islamic Center of Passaic County led by Imam Qatanani, having had five common officials as of 2004. For example, Younes has served on the mosque’s board of trustees.

Younes sounds sympathetic to the cause of Hamas. He said in 2001, “I put myself in the Palestinians’ shoes, the suffering, the pain, the hunger. I don’t know what I would do. Are they dogs? Are they garbage? I don’t want to see anyone killed. But you can’t be selective.” He called the U.S. hypocritical for condemning Hamas but not Israel. However, he said he would not donate to Hamas because “they are killers,” but supports giving aid to the children of killed Hamas operatives.

During Qatanani’s deportation trial, Prosecutor Alan Wolf said that a pamphlet was found at the ICPC after the 9/11 attacks that explained what Muslims should not tell the police. Wolf also mentioned that a newspaper quoted Younes in 2002 where he advised against giving personal information to law enforcement. As he left, Younes complained, “The FBI is abusing us.”

Read more

Ryan Mauro is RadicalIslam.org’s National Security Analyst and a fellow with the Clarion Fund. He is the founder of WorldThreats.com and is frequently interviewed on Fox News.

Louie Gohmert: Our National Security is Being Sacrificed on The Altar of Political Correctness

 

Published on Jul 27, 2012 by 

Rep. Louie Gohmert (TX01) spoke on the House floor about the five letters he and Reps. Bachmann, Franks, Rooney and Westmoreland sent to the Inspectors Generals of the Offices of the Director of National Intelligence, the Department of Defense, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Justice and the Department of State – concerning the infiltration of the Muslim Brotherhood. He stresses that our “national security is being sacrificed on the altar of political correctness.”

 

Head of Homeland Security: White House Will Continue to Host Members of Designated Terrorist Group

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano arrives to testify before the House Homeland Security Committee on July 25, 2012 in Washington, DC. (Photo by T.J. Kirkpatrick/Getty Images

By  at The Blaze

During a House Homeland Security Committee hearing on Wednesday, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano told Congress on that the United States should expect more visits from members of a designated terrorist organization.

The comments, coming from the head of a department tasked with keeping America safe from terrorist threats, are jaw-dropping.

“I think you are right in pointing out that as we move forward we are going to continue to have visitors to this country that the State Department and others feel are useful to bring to the country to have discussions moving forward, who say they are members of the political party that in the past have been so designated,” Napolitano told committee chairman Pete King (R-N.Y.) during the hearing this morning.

Napolitano was justifying the government’s decision to invite Hani Nour Eldin — an Egyptian parliamentary member elected as a member the Islamic Group (Gamaa Islamiya), which has been designated as a foreign terrorist organization by the State Department — to the White House to meet with high-ranking Obama administration and State Department officials.

After King reminded her that Eldin is a member of a designated foreign terrorist group, Napolitano replied, ”I think we have to add more nuance to that.”

“We have to know what the group was. Is it now a political party that is running the government of a country that has strong ties to the United States?” she said. She also added that Eldin was properly “vetted” before he granted entry into the U.S. “Everyone who looked at this person felt confident that he was not a security risk to the White House or to the United States,” she said.

“But with all this vetting, the fact is, on his own Facebook page he said he was a member of the Islamic group, which is a designated foreign terrorist organization,” King replied.

King was clearly not appeased with Napolitano’s answers. He went on to accuse the Obama administration of breaking the law in opening the White House doors to a member of a terrorist organization.

“It appears as if the law was not complied with in that he did not apply for a waiver, Congress was not notified, which is also required,” he told the DHS head. “It does not appear that either the letter or the spirit of the law was complied with.”

“On the process, that’s a fair point to make,” Napolitano later conceded.

King pointed out that in the 1940s some State Department officials argued that Chairman Mao, a brutal Chinese revolutionary, was an “agrarian reformer” and Cuba’s Fidel Castro was labeled as a “Jeffersonian Democrat” by some in the 1950s. He said the agency is making the same mistake with some radical Islamic groups in trying to reason and work with them.

Gohmert Holds DHS Secretary Napolitano Accountable

Rep. Louie Gohmert (TX-01) questioned Department of Homeland Security Secretary Napolitano about Mohamed Elibiary, who was reported to have accessed classified information after the DHS provided him a secret security clearance. He followed up on the investigation he called for last year.

Rep. Gohmert’s initial call for an investigation into this matter:

Homegrown Jihad in the USA

Citizens for National Security

On July 25th, 2011, over 100 people crowded into a Capitol Hill room in the Rayburn House Office Building designed for 75 to hear CFNS co-Founder Dr. Peter Leitner reveal the first report of its kind about the fifty-year infiltration of the Muslim Brotherhood into the United States and its culmination in homegrown Jihad. The event immediately made waves, with parts of the presentation quickly  airing on YouTube, and others being covered in print that week. As a result, CFNS has walked onto the national stage and is now certainly recognized as a leading American citizens organization in the battle against Islamist terrorism!

Dr. William A. Saxton, Rep. Allen West, Dr. Peter Leitner

Congressman Allen West, who sponsored the DC briefing, introduced the program with an expression of praise and unequivocal support for CFNS. In the audience were reporters and cameramen from Fox News and CBN, journalists representing more than ten different online news sites, senior staff from over two dozen members of the House and Senate, officials from the Department of Homeland Security and the military, and representatives from a wide variety of Washington think tanks and lobbying organizations.

Dr. Peter Leitner

Following CFNS Chairman Dr. William Saxton’s overview of CFNS, Dr. Leitner used a riveting PowerPoint presentation to outline the activities of the Muslim Brotherhood and the organizations it supports in the United States. He minced no words in systematically setting forth descriptions of the MB’s founders, the current leaders, the ideology, and its U.S. infiltration plan. He also announced the unprecedented development of CFNS’s proprietary database of almost 6000 individuals associated with the MB in the U.S. and the approximately 200 organizations with which they are involved.

Click the following link to view the report:

Homegrown Jihad in the USA: Muslim Brotherhood’s Deliberate Premeditated Plan Now Reaching Maturity [pdf]

Watch What You Say: A Guide for Dhimmis

by EDWARD  CLINE: Feeling a need to humor myself, and casting about for a way to cock a snook  at the Department of Homeland Security and The Transportation Security  Administration (in German, Die Abteilung der Heimatland-Sicherheit, and Die Transport-Sicherheitsverwaltung, one click of the heels and raised  right arm, palm down, required for pronunciation, if you can manage it) and  strike a blow for freedom of speech and the First and Fourth Amendments, the DHS  provided me with a salubrious vehicle.

Cowboy  Byte and other blog sites reported the grudging release by the DHS of  its 39-page Analyst’s  Desktop Binder (2011) containing words employed anywhere on the  Internet that should cause red flags and whistles and bells to awaken the  glaze-eyed human monitors and alert over-heating computers to open that Binder  and follow its instructions.

The list is pseudo-comprehensive,  including obvious terms that would slap a monitor on the back of his head when  they pop up, and numerous terms used millions of times every day by Internet  users, so that one wonders why they were included, unless the monitors and  computers are programmed to look for suspicious combinations of two or more of  them in sneaky repetitions or recurrences. The DHS may as well have programmed  the whole Oxford English Dictionary and the Cambridge Complete  Works of Shakespeare. “

The keywords are included.in the Binder,”  notes Cowboy Byte, “which also instructs analysts to hunt down media reports  that reflect poorly on the department.” And they’re not even in  alphabetical order. Very, very sly. Makes it difficult to follow.

“It doesn’t include the keyword list used by Obama’s gang of plumbers who  troll the Net for negative stories, or the NSA, which represents a whole  different set of eyes that are watching you.” Well, let’s give that a try,  and reflect” poorly on our very own We Never Sleep Detective Agency, and imagine  the critical infrastructure of the average DHS monitor’s mind when he’s  on the job. Words in italics are push-their-button terms, except for  book titles and the like. But, then, you never know. The lexicon reputedly is  incomplete.

As a new hire, our man probably went through several weeks  of orientation with other recruits, and he might have innocently asked his  instructor why the Koran was not listed the Desktop Binder. The guide hemmed and  hawed in his best professorial manner, claiming that Islam was never considered  an enemy, all the evidence to the contrary, but the question was secretly logged  into the new hire’s personnel file under “Possible Islamophobic Tendencies and Symptoms.” Not an auspicious start of a career of snooping.

The guide’s answer was also secretly entered into his own personnel file. After  a brief review of his record by a permanent and anonymous committee of employee  evaluation, he was subsequently and regretfully furloughed, and his security  clearance rescinded. One of his new hire charges happened to have been working  for Internal Affairs, a department charged with the task of policing  trainers and training classes and just about everyone who worked for the DHS.  Except for Internal Affairs personnel.

In the subterranean  consciousness of rank-and-file snoops, Internal Affairs had a nickname, the Mutaween, or The Committee for the Promotion of Virtue and the Prevention of Crimethink, modeled, some said, after the Saudi Arabian  religious police, although no one dared investigate and confirm the parallel,  nor could they, for all references to Islam, Muslims, mosques, beards and burkas  had been excised from DHS literature. “Rhymes with Halloween,” whispered the  lowly amongst themselves.

Our new monitor learned later that any blunt  but incautious reference to Islam and Muslims within the confines of his job -  and even during chitchat at the water cooler or in the break room or at the  Starbucks down the street – was considered hazmat jibber-jabber and  evidence of a radioactive mindset that would be closely monitored by  his supervisor. He would come to realize that if he did not wish to be  considered toxic by his colleagues, he’d better put his mind in  permanent lockdown. The pay was too good and the benefits too fabulous  for him to risk losing them over a slip of the tongue or an impulsive fillip of  independent thought. How often had the orientation instructor emphasized that  certain words were verboten, because they could cause episodes of intellectual contamination, acting as bacteria that could metastasize into  a plague of epistemological Ebola, and render the DHS impotent  to detect and counter terrorists of anonymous and un-named allegiances?

Not to worry, however,” the instructor had droned on. “The Center for  Disease Control has had added to its purview a new task, per executive  order, that of managing mental mitigation among the populace. It works  closely with the Department of Education to reduce human-to-human ideational infections.”

One day, after a week on the job,  the new hire was taken to lunch at a very expensive restaurant on K Street, the  Tuscany Bar and Grille, by a veteran analyst, ostensibly to compliment him on  his alertness and the number of alarms the novice had sent his way with the  click of a button and the swish of a mouse.

After Trish, the comely  waitress had taken their orders and served them glasses of Chianti, the analyst  smiled and said, “That last referral of yours I had to share with my colleagues  upstairs. It was worth a chuckle. The dirty bombe was merely a dessert  recipe a lady in New Haven had sent to a friend in Cannes, consisting of  strawberry mousse and ice cream packed into a pound cake coated with dark  chocolate Godiva sprinkles.” The analyst laughed. “Hardly the ingredients for an explosion, except to one’s waistline, But she called it her ‘Bombe  Sale,’ or Dirty Bombe,’ and we had her investigated anyway. There was  nothing cryptic in her communication. Our computers also analyzed the text and  found nothing threatening in it, and gave the email a pass.”

“Sorry about that,” said the novice, humbled, and forgetting to smile at the  analyst’s funny.

“No, no,” assured the analyst. “Don’t be sorry. It  showed you know the drill.” He paused. “By the way, I heard that the  lobby scanners confiscated a few books you brought to work the other  day. What was that one? Atlas Shrugged?” The veteran clucked his tongue  and shook his head. “At your age, reading such subversive trash!”

The  novice looked perplexed. “Know your enemy,” he ventured. “That’s been my  motto.”

“Well, there’s a difference between knowing one’s enemy, and  denying he is one. Our job is to detect and foil terrorists of all stripes,  especially intellectual terrorists, such as the author of that badly penned  novel. Leave enemy designations to your superiors. Don’t go wandering off on  your own. There is a point where initiative becomes a vice.”

“Sorry,” answered the novice.

“Then there was that other book the  screeners took,” said the analyst, furling his brow.

The Satiric  Verses?” “Satanic Verses, sir,” corrected the novice with  a tone of polite deference.

“Yes, yes,” acknowledged the analyst. “By  that odd fellow, what is his name? Salmonella?” “Salman  Rushdie,” said the novice.

Read more at Family Security Matters

Muslim US ICE Intelligence Officer Under Cloud of Suspicion over Financial Scam

Shariah Finance Watch: This news story proves the adage that truth is indeed stranger than fiction.

It seems that a US Department of Homeland Security Immigration and Customs Enforcement intelligence officer has been embroiled in serious financial impropriety.

But wait, that isn’t even HALF the story. It gets much worse.

This intelligence officer is a former colonel in the Jordanian Air Force named Ahmed Abdallat. Abdallat started working for the US federal government way back in 1995 and has had access to all sorts of sensitive and classified documents and programs during his tenure. He has also been posted around the world, especially in the Middle East, including Saudi Arabia. Most recently, Abdallat has been assigned to an intelligence post right on the US-Mexican border in El Paso, Texas, an area that has been given increasing scrutiny due to persistent reports of Hezbollah activity.

Abdallat is caught up in a fraud and money laundering scandal involving a Department of Homeland Security ICE official named James Woosley, who scammed the taxpayer systematically over a three-year period.

Law enforcement officials stealing is bad enough, but in our view, Abdallat’s involvement is the potentially much bigger story here. You see, we know that Woosely was using his ill-gotten gain to buy a new boat and a second home.

Not Abdallat.

Abdallat wired $570,000 to bank accounts in the Middle East. Maybe Abdallat was just sending his money overseas for himself. But maybe he was sending money overseas for an entirely different purpose…One thing we do know: Abdallat didn’t make anywhere near enough money off of his US government salary to explain over a half million dollars in wire transfers.

To make matters worse, when the FBI raided Abdallat’s home, they found two Jordanian passports, which he wasn’t supposed to have and they found evidence of several Middle Eastern bank accounts that Abdallat denied having…

There certainly seems to be more to this than just a bureaucrat who got greedy…All the focus of the media on this investigation seems to be on Woosley. We think more scrutiny should focus on Ahmed Abdallat.