Christians Face Persecution, Extinction in Islamic Lands

COPTIC CHRISTIANS PRAY INSIDE CHURCH IN CAIRO

During this Christian holiday season, the message from the world — and even from the top ranks of Christendom — to Christians facing Islamic jihad and the imposition of sharia would seem to be: “You’re on your own.”

by Clare M. Lopez
Radicalislam.org
March 27, 2013

Across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, Islam is on the march again and Christians are marked for annihilation. In lands once known as the heartland of Christianity, where the Apostles and early missionaries spread their faith, Christianity is a faith under fire and Christians themselves are a dwindling presence.

Nowhere is the Islamic assault against Christians more intense than the killing fields of Syria, where rebel advances by both the al-Qa’eda affiliate, Jabhat al-Nusra, and Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated militias of the Syrian Free Army (SFA), inevitably result in pogroms against Christian populations in every town they capture from the Bashar al-Assad regime that previously had protected Syria’s minority Christians.

As Nina Shea wrote recently at National Review Online, the 2,000-year-old Christian Assyrian community in embattled Syria literally faces extinction, as an Islamic “ethno-religious cleansing” targets its defenseless members with kidnappings, murder, rape and threats.

Like Iraq’s Assyrian and Chaldean communities before it (some of whose members had fled to Syria for safety), the Christians of Syria are now fleeing in droves, many to Lebanon, and some even back to Iraq. The Chaldean Catholic bishop of Aleppo, Antoine Audo, reports that as many as 30,000 Christians have fled that devastated city alone.

Juliana Taimoorazy, the founder and president of the Iraqi Christian Relief Council, has highlighted the desperate plight of Iraq’s original people, the Assyrians and Chaldeans, descendants of mighty civilizations and Christian since the first century. Since the Council’s founding in 2008, Taimoorazy has made it her mission to document and speak about the devastation wreaked against Iraqi Christian businesses, churches and homes in the years since 2003, when the ouster of Saddam Hussein brought to power the jihadist forces of Shi’ite Islam.

Waves of violence, killing and forced displacement have slashed the pre-2003 number of churches in Iraq from 300 to just 57, and the number of beleaguered Christians from some 1.4 million to perhaps only half a million in 2013.

Read more

 

Investigate Benghazigate

1451690329By Frank Gaffney:

After Iraq was liberated from Saddam Hussein’s despotic misrule, critics denounced the then-incumbent president with the charge that “Bush lied, people died.”  It never ceases to amaze that among the most prominent of those making this slanderous accusation were past and present Democratic legislators who had publicly pronounced exactly what George W. Bush did:  Saddam possessed – and used – weapons of mass destruction (WMD).  And they, like Mr. Bush, had every reason to believe and did believe that such weapons, or worse, might be used again unless his regime were overthrown.

Put simply, there never had been any conscious or deliberate effort to deceive the American people.  Neither did the President seek to deflect responsibility for his actions.  To the contrary, his top political advisor, Karl Rove, subsequently acknowledged that his greatest mistake – at least until he made a centi-million-dollar hash-up of Campaign 2012 – was preventing any official effort from being mounted to counter the calumny about Mr. Bush lying about Iraqi WMD, with the predictable effect of allowing the credibility of the Bush 43 presidency to be destroyed.

By contrast, people did die in Benghazi on September 11, 2012 due to Barack Obama’s policies and he lied about it, repeatedly and knowingly.  This scandalous reality has come to be popularly known as “Benghazigate.”

If we don’t find out what led up to, occurred during and happened afterwards –and the role played by the President and his senior subordinates throughout – there will certainly be more lies and may be more American deaths.

Read more at Center For Security Policy

 

New Syrian Opposition Leader: Islamist-In-Chief

Sheikh Ahmed Moaz al-Khatib

The new leader of Syria’s opposition has a history of statements that are anti-Semitic, outrageous, and sometimes downright bizarre.

BY MOHANAD HAGE ALI

Even as opponents of President Bashar al-Assad have gained ground inside Syria, the political opposition in exile has remained famously divided. The Syrian National Council, a body formed more than a year ago with the goal of uniting all opposition groups, was the poster child for these failures:  Many of its most prominent members resigned in anger over the Muslim Brotherhood’s domination of its top ranks and the council’s detachment from groups inside the country.

However, recent developments have prompted a burst of optimism about the state of Syria’s opposition. On Nov. 11, anti-Assad groups met in Doha, Qatar, where they hashed out an agreement, under U.S. and Qatari auspices, to form the National Coalition of Syrian Revolutionary and Opposition Forces. The new rebel coalition was hailed as the first truly representative opposition body — and its new leader, Sheikh Ahmed Moaz al-Khatib, was widely praised as the perfect figure to represent the opposition to the world.

Syria’s opposition received an immediate diplomatic boost after the formation of the new coalition. France recognized it as the sole legitimate representative of the Syrian people, and pledged to reexamine the possibility of shipping arms to the rebels. The Arab League also recognized the body, with Secretary General Nabil al-Araby hailing it as a “glimmer of hope.” By dispelling Western fears of growing jihadist influence within the Free Syrian Army, the rebels hope, the new coalition can open the door to increased financial and military assistance from the international community.

The election of the Cairo-based Khatib, a former imam of Damascus’s historic Umayyad Mosque who was imprisoned under Assad, is a crucial part of this strategy. Western media outlets such as the BBC were quick to declare him “a respected figure within Syria” who holds “moderate” political views, citing his trips to Britain and the United States, as well as his teaching experience at the Dutch Institute in Damascus, as evidence. However, public statements posted on the clergyman’s website, darbuna.net, paint a different picture.

Khatib’s website features numerous instances of anti-Semitic rhetoric. In one of his own articles, he writes that one of Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein’s positive legacies was “terrifying the Jews.” He has also published others’ anti-Semitic observations on his site: In one article, written by Abdul Salam Basiouni, Jews are described as “gold worshipers.” Finally, in an obituary of a Gaza sheikh copied from IslamSyria, Jews are dubbed “the enemies of God.”

While Khatib used his post-election speech to call for equal rights for “all parts of the harmonious Syrian people,” his previous rhetoric toward his country’s minorities has been nothing short of virulent. One of his articles describes Shiite using the slur rawafid, or “rejectionists”; he even goes further, criticizing Shiites’ ability to “establish lies and follow them.” Such language, needless to say, will hardly reassure the country’s Alawite community, a Shiite offshoot to which Assad belongs.

Read more at Foreign Policy

US to take Iran group MEK off terror list, sources say

AP: The Obama administration will remove from the U.S. terrorism list an Iranian  militant group formerly allied with Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, officials  said Friday, describing a move that will infuriate Tehran and end years of  high-profile campaigning by the group.

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton will notify Congress of her intent  later Friday, the officials said. A court order had given her until Oct. 1 to  make a decision about the Mujahedeen-e-Khalq, or MEK. The officials spoke on  condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to speak about the  matter.

Clinton’s decision comes just days after the last big batch of the Iranian  exiles reluctantly left their decades-old paramilitary base in northeastern  Iraq, relocating for now to a refugee camp outside Baghdad. The U.S. had  insisted that the MEK’s 3,000 members comply with an Iraqi demand to leave Camp  Ashraf as a condition of the MEK’s removal from the list of foreign terrorist  organizations.

Derided by its critics as a cult, the group has journeyed through multiple  countries and the shifting alliances of the Middle East over its four-decade  history. The MEK helped Islamic clerics overthrow Iran’s shah before carrying  out a series of bombings and assassinations against the Iranian government. It  fought in the 1980s alongside Saddam’s forces in the Iran-Iraq war, but disarmed  after the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003. It has since suffered violent  recriminations from Iraq’s new Shiite-dominated government.

The decision to remove the MEK list rested on two factors: whether it still  had the capacity and intent to commit acts of terror. Several American military  officials and defense contractors were killed by the MEK in the 1970s, U.S.  officials maintain, and its attacks have killed hundreds of Iranians. But the  group contended it swore off violence more than a decade ago and now only seeks  a peaceful overthrow of Iran’s theocratic government.

The MEK assembled a high-profile roster of champions even as it remained on  the U.S. blacklist. Luminaries who’ve advocated for the MEK’s removal from the  list include former Attorney General Michael Mukasey, former FBI Director Louis  Freeh, former Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge, former Pennsylvania Gov. Ed  Rendell and James Jones, President Barack Obama’s first national security  adviser.

That led the Treasury Department earlier this year to examine whether the  officials were providing illegal material support to designated terrorists; that  civil inquiry probably would be nullified now. Removal from the list also should  make it easier for the MEK to raise money and recruit in the United  States.

The organization is far from Iran’s mainstream opposition, however.

The group has an ideology mixing Marxism, secularism, an obsession with  martyrdom and near adoration of its leaders. A 2009 report by the security think  tank RAND accuses it of fraudulent recruiting as well as “authoritarian control,  confiscation of assets, sexual control (including mandatory divorce and  celibacy), emotional isolation, forced labor, sleep deprivation, physical abuse  and limited exit options.”

MEK supporters say this is Iranian propaganda, pointing to several former  members who’ve freely left the group.

It also vehemently rejects the Iranian accusation that members have worked  with Israel to assassinate several Iranian nuclear scientists. U.S. officials  say there is no evidence to suggest recent terrorist activity by the  group.

U.S. officials said Clinton’s letter to Congress would not amount to a final  designation. That will probably come in a couple of weeks as officials unfreeze  assets held by the group in the United States and other legal work that might  allow it to open a U.S. office.

Camp Ashraf is not yet fully closed. An estimated 200 exiles remain there to  try to sell off the property that was left behind in the move, but Iraq’s  government wants them to leave quickly.

The hostility of Baghdad’s Shiite leaders reflect its desire to build  stronger ties with Iran, but also the deep hatred for the group in Iraq because  of its purported role in helping Saddam crush Shiite and Kurdish revolts in the  1990s.

When the MEK handed over its hundreds of tanks and artillery pieces to U.S.  forces, the Bush administration agreed to protect the group and posted soldiers  and a general at the camp for years. The army and the MEK even worked on joint  patrols and other emergency plans.

But for Iraqi authorities the camp remained a no-go zone. In effect, the MEK  attempted to defend a sovereign zone inside the post-Saddam Iraq, which U.S.  officials say contributed to violence.

An Iraqi raid last year left 34 exiles dead.

The MEK has shown footage of the atrocities and gained U.S. support. But it  said it needed the administration to act because the terrorist label helped  Iraqi authorities justify mistreatment of its members and made it harder for  residents to find permanent homes in other nations.

Most of its members are now in Camp Liberty, a former U.S. base designed as a  compromise way-station for the United Nations to speed them out of Iraq  peacefully. Several governments are weighing whether to accept them. Washington  could allow the immigration of some, but none that were actively involved in  terrorist attacks from the 1970s-1990s, officials have said.

After suffering a crackdown under Iran’s monarchy, the MEK helped Ayatollah  Ruhollah Khomeini overthrow U.S.-backed Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi in Iran’s  Islamic Revolution in 1979.

It then quickly fell out with Khomeini, and thousands of its followers were  killed, imprisoned or forced into exile. It launched its campaign of  assassinations and bombings against Iran’s government in retaliation. The U.S.  declared it a terrorist organization in 1997 at a time when Washington sought  warmer relations with Tehran under the reformist presidency of Mohammad  Khatami.

Yet the group also has provided the Americans with intelligence on Iran and  convinced many governments that it has abandoned terrorism. In 2002, it revealed  Iran’s secret work on uranium enrichment near the city of Natanz — intelligence  that many speculated came from Israel’s Mossad.

Read more at Fox News

Caliphate Conference Finds New Venue at Last Minute

By Ryan Mauro:

Though our efforts compelled the Meadows Club to back out of hosting Hizb ut-Tahrir’s anti-American, anti-democracy Khilafah Conference, the group had just enough time to find another venue. On Saturday night, just hours before the event, the Chicago Daily Herald reported that the Lexington Houseof Hickory Hills, Illinois, had agreed to host Hizb ut-Tahrir.

Hizb ut-Tahrir tried to stream the event online from noon to 4 PM on Sunday, June 17, along with a post-event press conference. The streaming was sporadic and had very poor audio, so at about 1:30 I called the Lexington House and asked to speak to the manager. The woman who answered confirmed that it was hosting the conference and I asked if she was aware of what Hizb ut-Tahrir is. She said that the event was booked about a week ago under a person’s name and she only learned about the group yesterday. When I asked what she thought of Hizb ut-Tahrir, she said “no comment” and hung up.

I called back, thinking that my cell phone signal may have dropped. “No. I hung up on you. I don’t have anything else to say,” she said as she again hung up on me.

At around 2 PM, I sent the Lexington House an email with a link to our article about HUT, offering one more chance for a comment and, if they wanted to, an apology or explanation. I have not heard back thus far.

Another person who called the Lexington House said the same thing happened. The woman confirmed she was the one who agreed to host the extremist group and hung up after saying, “No, I am not concerned and no, I will not talk to you anymore.”

If you wish to contact the Lexington House and let them know how you feel and, if you are a nearby resident, how it’ll affect your business with them, you can email them at info@lexingtonhousebanquets.com or call them at 708-598-4150. We suggest mentioning our well-researched article.

It was very difficult to understand what the conference speakers were saying as the streaming often failed and had poor audio, but I listened carefully and virtually the entire conference was dedicated to condemning the U.S., democracy and capitalism and telling Muslims that a war is being waged on Islam and it is being led by America. As far as I could tell, there was not a single positive thing stated about the U.S.

There was no explicit call to violence except for in defense of Muslims in Syria but it is easy to see why HUT’s ideology would trigger violent jihad. Later in the conference, a speaker said Islam must be spread non-violently, but as we reported, HUT is officially non-violent as an organization even though it has endorsed violent jihad in Muslim lands and Israel.

One of the first things I noticed when the streaming came online was how the U.S. is damned by HUT no matter what it does. The first speaker I saw slammed the U.S. for supporting the Saudi Royal Family, the Shah of Iran, Saddam Hussein, Hosni Mubarak and Bashar Assad. A significant amount of time was spent portraying Assad as an ally of the U.S. even though he has been one of America’s worst enemies, even helping to kill U.S. soldiers in Iraq. Even Iran was described as a “tool” of the U.S. during the question-and-answer period at the end.

The fact that the U.S. abandoned the Shah, overthrew Saddam Hussein, publicly called on Mubarak to resign and is demanding that Assad leave power and is backing the Syrian rebels makes absolutely no difference to HUT, who sees these actions as part of an American imperialist scheme. The U.S. is condemned if it does nothing and is condemned if it does anything.

HUT used the conference to preach that the Arab Spring, referred to by one speaker as the “Islamic Upheaval,” is an Islamist revolution to bring about Sharia-based governance that was sparked by U.S.-backed oppression. The speaker also mentioned poverty as a cause of the “Islamic Upheaval” and preached that the West’s economic troubles prove the failures of capitalism and the failure of any system not based solely on Islam as HUT sees it.

He also gleefully mentioned Islamist victories in elections in Turkey, Egypt, Tunisia, Algeria and Palestine. HUT criticizes the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas for participating in elections but still looks kindly upon their election victories. Their extremism, including their terrorism, as far as I could tell with poor audio, was not condemned even once. On the other hand, it seemed like barely a minute went by without the U.S. being condemned.

HUT’s immediate objective is mobilizing support for the Bashar Assad fight against Bashar Assad in Syria. The speaker discussing this topic warned that the U.S. had laid a three-part trap for the rebels based on the “Yemeni solution:” Sell out the leadership, control the rebels and betray the revolution. HUT teaches that the U.S. wants to sideline Assad but keep the current regime in place and only supports the rebels so it can control them. The speaker told the Muslim armies that they are obliged to “intervene militarily” and it is not enough to just provide humanitarian assistance.

Read more at Radical Islam

Ryan Mauro is RadicalIslam.org’s National Security Analyst and a fellow with the Clarion Fund. He is the founder of WorldThreats.com and is frequently interviewed on Fox News.

 

 

 

From Rebel Pundit: H/T Sheik Yer Mami:

Exclusive: Illinois Khilafah Conference “Capitalism is to Blame”

There were four speakers at the event, three of which that wanted to remain unidentified, with the center of attention focusing upon the key note speaker, Dr. Mohammed Malkawi aka Abu Talha, Hizb’s Deputy Spokesperson. The following are some of the claims made by the four speakers:

  1. American Capitalism has caused all that is wrong with the Muslim world today.
  2. The Capitalist System was created to restrict Muslims.
  3. Jews and Christians will not be happy with Muslims until they adopt their way of life.
  4. The fall of Communism and the decline of Capitalism sends a clear message that the rise of Islam is imminent.
  5. Capitalism has failed due to its high suicide, high poverty, and many other adverse rates, while at the same time there were no statistics mentioned about  the same rates in Arab Nations.
  6. Capitalism systematically creates poor people.
  7. The Democratic process in the US and around the world is a mirage.
  8. Obama failed on two issues, Palestine and dealing with the entire Muslim world.

That they are a peaceful non-violent movement, however, while viewing the diagram on the overhead projector showing the structure of the Sharia governing cabinet, it listed a private secretary in charge of Jihad.