German Govt Forced Cover-Up of Cologne Sex Crimes

Capture-4By Counter Jihad, April 7, 2016:

Immediately after hundreds of women were raped by Muslim migrants during Cologne’s new year’s celebrations, the German government went into overdrive to cast doubt on the claims that Muslims were at fault.  A new leaked police memo reveals that not only was there no doubt in the initial reports, Germany’s Interior Ministry forced a police cover-up.

Describing the offences, [the memo] said… “The criminal group was consistently described by the victims as North Africans, between 17-28 years of age. Investigations are continuing”….

More damning than the revelation that police knew about the attacks and kept them from the public was the explicit order to play down the seriousness of crimes by the Interior ministry. An “internal police memo” which detailed “a request from the ministry” instructed police that they were to “cancel” the use of the word “rape” in their reports.

The Interior Minister, Ralf Jäger, fired the police chief when reports revealed police were too overstretched to respond effectively to the massive number of sexual assaults by Muslim migrants.

Yet the real problem is not one police chief, but the mass immigration itself.  According to a study by the German police, the increase in sexual assaults is expected to be less than one percent of the increased criminality brought by these migrants.  The previous year, that police agency had responded 93,000 times to assaults sparked by Muslim migrants.  Most of those were not sexual assaults, but violent clashes brought on by the imported ethnic and sectarian hatreds the migrants brought with them.  In addition, the report noted, Islamist recruiting was flourishing in migrant camps.

Minister Jäger has come across this page before, ironically for making a similar claim to the one that caused him to fire his police chief.  Referring to a new Islamic gang styling itself as a “fight club” and clashing with the Hells Angels, the minister claimed that there was simply no police solution to the problem.  The rate of expansion of the gang is so rapid, he said, that as he takes away the colors from one member, two other put on new colors.

Germany’s refusal to take these threats seriously is provoking a major right-wing political shift in the country.  Revelations that their own government prevented German women from filing police reports about their rapes ought to be maddening.  Their government has already admitted that it is permitting Muslim immigration at a rate far greater than their police are able to address.  Now we learn that the government has decided that the right way to repair that fault is to lie to the public.  Hiding the truth will not change it.  It will only worsen the consequences when they come.

***

Breitbart’s Oliver Lane discusses the story:

New Refugee Deal Goes Into Force in Europe

Migrants from Pakistan wait to enter Moria camp for migrants and refugees on the Greek island of Lesbos on March 21, 2016. PHOTO: STR/AFP/GETTY IMAGES

Migrants from Pakistan wait to enter Moria camp for migrants and refugees on the Greek island of Lesbos on March 21, 2016.
PHOTO: STR/AFP/GETTY IMAGES

By CounterJihad, March 21, 2016:

A new deal between Turkey and the European Union aims to limit the refugee flood pointed at Europe.  Refugees who do not apply for asylum, or whose requests are denied, will be returned to Turkey.  However, the European Union has promised to accept an equal number of refugees as those it deports to Turkey from Greece.  The deal also promises to make travel easier for Turkish nationals into Europe, and some financial payouts.

The number of refugees, principally from the civil war in Syria, has reached levels not seen since the Second World War.  The flood shows no sign of slowing.  Understanding that they will be dealing with refugees for some time to come, people across the Western world have been debating what to do.  In spite the short-term deal, there is no indication that a consensus is forming on the long term problem.

One argument stands on the fact that it is vastly more expensive to care for refugees the further West they travel.  Estimates are that it costs ten times as much to care for a refugee within Europe proper than it does in states bordering Syria, where the cost of living is much cheaper.  A similar figure applies to refugees brought to America, a fact being discussed by the legislature in South Carolina:

Kevin Bryant, a Republican from Anderson, S.C., noted that the Palmetto State has welcomed almost 850 refugees from all over the world since 2010.  “Why should we bring one refugee here when we could spend the same money and help 10 in their part of the world?” Bryant told the Associated Press.

Others, especially in Canada, believe that refugees have a right to be resettled at any cost.  Indeed, the government is planning to use taxpayer money to build mosques across the country for the use of refugees.  The money would be taken out of the Defence Department’s budget, thus cutting military spending in favor of resettling refugees in Canada.

Critics in Europe say that costs are not limited to money alone.  They point to the chaos that the refugee crisis has brought.  Sweden has 53 “no-go” areas controlled by Muslims where police are not permitted to enter, according to a report by Danish journalist Jeppe Juhl.

Muslim leaders have rejected these kinds of arguments.  In America, the Council on American-Islamic Relations’ national spokesman said that such concerns are, if “not illegal,” at least “un-American.”  CAIR was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in a terrorist financing trial, but remains deeply involved in America’s debates over government policy toward Muslims.

In Europe, the Central Council of Muslims in Germany claims that the chaos caused by migrants proves that Islam is not a problem.  “The Muslim faith is irrelevant to these drunken men who do such disgraceful things,” according to the council’s leader.  Thus, though the men are Muslims, their failures are individual rather than a function of their faith.  But this does not explain the no-go zones that crop up in Islamic areas across Europe.

While the debate continues, refugees live in filth and squalor in many makeshift camps.  This is especially true for women and the children abandoned with them.  Reckless smugglers have flourished in the face of government disagreement.

***

Islam and Police

unnamed (9)

By Counter Jihad, March 15, 2016:

In Rotherham, England, three men have been facing trial for leading an Islamic cell that arranged the rape of children for sixteen years.  Police are finally out in force in Rotherham, after having ignored the cell for those sixteen years in spite of repeated reports from citizens.  They are out in force now to resist “Islamophobia.”  How big a problem is Islamophobia in Rotherham?  Police reports say that relevant complaints fell in frequency last year in spite of the trial.

In the city of Paris, where two major attacks by Islamic terrorists last year killed dozens and led to worldwide condemnation, police are under fire for having targeted Muslims visiting radical Imams.  Police say the man leading the protests against them not only visited a known radical but “recently traveled to a part of Brussels where several of the attackers in the Nov. 13 Paris assaults had lived, and that he had five cellphones and four USB memory sticks in his possession.”  Muslims say this is an abuse of the emergency powers, and that police were “mean” and “scornful” in conducting the raid.

Now social media provides a new way for Muslims in Europe to shame the police into giving way.

Muslims in Europe are striking back on social media. They are publicly shaming police officers who allegedly use racial profiling techniques for stops and searches, posting detailed exchanges with said officers, and sharing photographic evidence of the damage done after what they describe as wrongful raids.

French journalist Driss Abdi took to Twitter to denounce what he called racial profiling at Munich Airport. “Racial profiling in Germany? Only one stopped exiting the plane, I guess I’m a bit too brown #racism #police,” he tweeted, alongside a photograph of a female police officer who appeared to be checking his data at the airport.

This tactic is likely to work.  The Muslim Brotherhood’s influence on Western governments mean that the French like the British are taking advice on how to deal with Muslim populations that presses the police to turn a blind eye.  Even in America, the Boston police commissioner went to a mosque that has produced a dozen terrorists and proclaimed that“ We’re all Muslims deep down.”  ISIS disagrees:  they just published a kill list of Minnesota cops.

Even Israel and India, two nations that have suffered intense Islamic terrorism, there is pressure from on high to increase Muslim representation within the police forces.  There is pressure to reduce surveillance, not to speak critically, and to regard the local population as the real threat — a threat against Muslims.

It is as if the terrorist attacks never happened, when in fact they have happened over and over worldwide.  Security cannot be improved if we cannot think and speak the truth.

When Worlds Collide: Unassimilable Muslim Migrants Crash Europe’s Fantasy Islam

asylum-seekers in Germany

National Review, by ANDREW C. MCCARTHY January 9, 2016:

What happens when the West’s fantasy Islam collides with the reality of an imported critical mass of unassimilated — and defiantly unassimilable — Muslims?

Cologne happens.

Nor is it only Cologne. That was just Ground Zero of the New Year’s Eve rape jihad in Germany. As National Review’s Ian Tuttle notes in an alarming column about the predictable — and, if I may say, predicted — surge of sexual assault in a Europe overrun by “migrants,” the jihad included similar episodes, albeit on a smaller scale, in Stuttgart, Hamburg, and even astride the Brandenburg gate in Berlin.

We are finally learning about the magnitude and harrowing details of the attack after days of Stasi-like information suppression. Chancellor Angela Merkel may not be big on German security, but she is a bulwark when it comes to fantasy Islam.

First there was no news; then, a few disturbing hints of gropings and robberies by gangs of “Middle Eastern or North African” men. Now, we know it was a mass atrocity — the only remaining question being: How massive?

Upward of a thousand men, overwhelmingly Muslim, executed a coordinated series of attacks on an obvious target of opportunity: street celebrations in the major cities of a reviled Western state, where they were certain to find throngs of young women and a police presence grossly inadequate to provide security — certainly not against a critical mass of Islamic supremacists.

RELATED: Mass Muslim Immigration Will Bring Islam’s Problems Here

The participation of Muslim migrants in the rape jihad is, of course, the fact most desperately suppressed by German officials. Mrs. Merkel earned her “Person of the Year” honors from left-leaning relic Time magazine by rolling out the red carpet for a staggering 1.1 million migrants in 2015 — infuriating the German public and spurring the migrant tsunami now washing over neighboring countries. In this information clampdown, the nightmare of the victimized women turns out to be the chancellor’s good fortune: Police on the scene were so outnumbered and outmaneuvered by the assailants that it was physically impossible for them to get near most of the women being savaged, much less make arrests. Most of the perps will never be identified.

The media are already using this to cast doubt on migrant culpability. “It was not clear,” the New York Times opaquely explains, “that any of the men involved were among those who arrived in Germany over the past year from conflicts in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere.” Sure. In southern Germany, after two teenage girls (ages 14 and 15) were raped, police tripped over themselves to announce that the three Syrians arrestedwere not recently arrived asylum seekers. What a relief.

RELATED: Europeans Studiously Ignore Muslim Mobs

Nearly 200 women have filed criminal complaints in Cologne, the vast majority charging all manner of sexual assault. There have been few arrests, though, and nearly none involving sex crimes.

The Muslim men used a tactic that has escaped the notice of fantasy Islam devotees but is well known to those of us who’ve followed the scant reports on the rape jihad as it has proceeded from Tahrir Square to Malmö to Rotherham: A group of men encircles the targeted woman or girl, trapping her while walling off police and other would-be rescuers. Knowing they are a protected class, the Muslim men have no fear of the cops — “You can’t do anything to me,” and “Mrs. Merkel invited me here,” are just some of the reported taunts. By the time “help” reaches one victim, the assailants have moved on to the next.

It is not very effective law enforcement . . . but at least the cops can’t be accused of “Islamophobia,” right?

Still, Europe is not Nigeria — not yet. In the regressing advanced world, nothing on the scale of the New Year’s Eve siege can happen without tweets and pictures filtering out. Try as they might, German officials have been unable to put a lid on accounts from police explaining that “the large majority” of assailants they were able to identify were “from Syria,” or observing that “there were thousands of people who could not be specifically identified but who had an immigrant background, and were most probably refugees.”

RELATED: France’s No-Go Zones: Assimilation-Resistant Muslims Are the Real Refugee Crisis

Truth being the first casualty of war, it was left to Henriette Reker, the fantasy Islam–drenched mayor of Cologne, to blame the victims for their ordeal. Such assaults could be prevented, she declaimed, if German women adopted a “code of conduct” tailored to the new, multi-culti Deutschland.

In the spirit of multiculturalism, I have such a code just off the shelf (on which rests The Grand Jihad, in which I outlined it a few years back). It goes like this:

To be absolved from guilt, the raped woman must have shown some sort of good conduct . . . Islam addresses women to maintain their modesty, so as not to open the door for evil . . . The Koran calls on Muslim women in general to preserve their dignity and modesty, just to save themselves from any harassment. So for a rape victim to be absolved from guilt, she must not be the one that opens . . . her dignity for deflowering.

These pearls of wisdom come from none other than Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, the Muslim Brotherhood’s renowned sharia jurist. He proclaimed them on his popular IslamOnline website about a dozen years ago, right before he was welcomed into Britain — as a trustee of the Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies — despite his fatwas supporting Hamas suicide attacks in Israel and terrorism against Western troops in Iraq. Though he resides in Qatar, Qaradawi currently heads the Ireland-based European Council for Fatwa and Research.

Qaradawi is the most influential Muslim intellectual behind the strategy of, as he puts it, “conquering” Europe and America by “dawa” — the aggressive proselytism of Islamic mores. The plan calls for flooding the West with Muslim migrants, directing them to resist assimilation, establishing Islamic enclaves, and pressuring the host country to concede the enclave’s right to govern itself in accordance with sharia — Islam’s societal framework and legal code.

RELATED: Dispelling the ‘Few Extremists’ Myth — the Muslim World is Overcome with Hate

As I’ve previously explained, when Muslims are seeking conquest, Islamic scripture endorses sexual assault as a weapon to establish their dominance. “O Prophet,” Allah is said to have announced (in the Koran’s sura 33:50), “We have made lawful to thee thy wives to whom thou has paid their dowers, and those whom thy right hand possesses out of the captives of war whom Allah has assigned to thee.”

In the Western ministries of fantasy Islam, the pols and their note-takers will thumb their chins and wonder what could possibly have motivated the German attacks — just as they wonder what could possibly explain the European sexual-assault crisis that has, by some mysterious coincidence, coincided with mass Muslim migration.

The rest of us will know that there is a strategy: conquest. Just as in the Middle East, women and girls in the West are the spoils of jihad, the vehicle for intimidating non-Muslims into surrendering sovereignty over the streets. If they want to be safe, Sheikh Qaradawi warns, they must submit to Islam’s sartorial suffocation. If not, well, they have it coming.

By the way, since President Obama entered office, the United States has issued over 100,000 green cards per year to migrants from Muslim-majority countries. That’s just green cards — it doesn’t count the thousands of visas issued to students, tourists, and temporary workers. With the Republican-controlled Congress fully funding the effort, the government is on pace to award another 680,000 green cards to Muslim migrants — with their entitlement to lifetime residency, federal benefits, and a path to citizenship — in the next five years.

As Sheikh Qaradawi and Mayor Reker might say, I’m sure it won’t be a problem . . . as long as the women “maintain their modesty.”

— Andrew C. McCarthy is a policy fellow at the National Review Institute. His latest book is Faithless Execution: Building the Political Case for Obama’s Impeachment.

Also see:

Cologne sex attacks: City’s police chief ‘sacked’ over violence

(Left), Police arrest men around the main train station in Cologne. (Right), A note found by police on two suspects. Photo: Warren Allott/The Telegraph

(Left), Police arrest men around the main train station in Cologne. (Right), A note found by police on two suspects. Photo: Warren Allott/The Telegraph

Telegraph, by Justin Huggler, Jan. 8, 2016:

The police chief of Cologne has been sacked amid a backlash over a wave of sexual assaults on women in the city centre on New Year’s Eve, it has been reported.

The city’s authorities have been heavily criticised for their handling of the violence. They have drawn particular outrage for initially claiming there was no evidence that asylum seekers were involved in the violence, only for it to emerge that they had in fact detained several on the night.

The police chief Wolfgang Albers, 60, had so far resisted calls to resign. But he was informed by the state interior minister Ralf Jaeger that he would be given early retirement, a state government source told Reuters.

Earlier, police arrested two men “of an immigrant background” in connection with the sex attacks. One of the men was carrying a note in German and Arabic with translations of phrases including “Beautiful breasts”, “I want to have sex with you” and “I’ll kill you”, according to police.

They have since been released for lack of evidence.

It was confirmed on Friday that asylum seekers are among suspects being sought over the violence.

Police have identified 31 suspects, of whom 18 are asylum seekers, the German interior ministry said. They are not suspected of sexual assault, but of physical violence and theft.

The suspects include nine Algerians, eight Moroccans, four Syrians, five Iranians, two Germans, an Iraqi, a Serb, and an American, a spokesman for the ministry said.

Federal police are carrying out their own investigations in parallel to the Cologne police. The federal force is responsible for the main station but not for the surrounding streets, where much of the worst sexual violence is believed to have occurred.

News of the arrests came as police in Finland and Switzerland reported similar sex attacks on women over the New Year.

Three asylum seekers have been arrested in Helsinki. Finnish police said they had received information that groups of asylum seekers planned to harass women in the city.

“This is a completely new phenomenon in Helsinki,” lkka Koskimaki, deputy police chief, said.

Police in Zurich said six women had reported being sexually assaulted and robbed on New Year’s Eve in cases “a little similar” to those in Germany.

There have been reports of similar attacks in cities across Germany and in neighbouring Austria.

More than 170 women have now come forward and filed criminal complaints over the New Year’s Eve incidents in Cologne, 113 of them for sexual assault.

Police say they have identified 21 suspects from video footage, most of whom are still at large.

The city authorities have been accused of trying to hide the fact asylum seekers were involved for fear of political sensitivities.

“Police concealed the origin of the suspects,” was Friday’s headline in Kölner Stadt-Anzeiger, a local newspaper.

“Incident report proves identity of suspects was hushed up,” Express, another local newspaper, said.

Germany cities with attacks

New Years eve attacks

***

Pamela Geller on Sean Hannity Radio Show: Muslim Migrant Sex Attack Mobs on New Year’s Eve, Germany:

WATCH: Cologne Body Builder Who Tried To Protect Women From Rapist Migrants: ‘I Beat Them All Up’:

***

Read what this blogger from Germany says about the refugee crisis- “Everything about this development bears the hallmarks of a military/intelligence operation.”

Also see:

U.S. Warns Employers to Protect Muslim Rights, Directs Victims to File Complaints

20131004_obama_stunned_stupid_eyesclosed_LARGEjpgFamily Security Matters, by Judicial Watch, Jan. 7, 2016:

In the aftermath of the San Bernardino terrorist attacks the Obama administration has issued a new warning regarding workplace discrimination “against individuals who are, or perceived to be, Muslim or Middle Eastern.”

American businesses are to accommodate the religious needs of Muslims and assure that they aren’t being harassed or intimidated, states the order which was issued by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the bloated federal agency that enforces the nation’s workplace discrimination laws. Those who don’t oblige will be prosecuted by the administration for violating federal law, specifically Title VII of the Civil Right Act which prohibits discrimination on the bases of religion.

“The attacks in Paris and San Bernardino, California, in late 2015 and other recent world events have heightened concerns about workplace protections for all employees, including individuals who are, or are perceived to be, Muslim or Middle Eastern,” the EEOC asserts in its recently issued document. “Discrimination in the workplace based on religion, national origin, or race is strictly prohibited by federal and state laws. Reactions in the workplace to world events demand increased efforts by employers to prevent discrimination.” EEOC Chair Jenny R. Yang refers to Muslims as “vulnerable communities” that need protection “even as we grapple with the concerns raised by the recent terrorist attacks.”

In the last few years the administration has sued a number of U.S. businesses for violating Muslim civil rights under Title VII, including companies in Nebraska, California and Colorado for not accommodating prayer breaks and forbidding Islamically-mandated headscarves (hijabs) on the job. Just a few months ago the EEOC helped two Muslim truck drivers working for an American company in the U.S. get hefty settlements after being fired for refusing to transport alcohol because it violates their religious beliefs. American taxpayers pick up the tab for all this litigation, which is conducted in federal courts throughout the nation.

Though the effort to protect Muslim rights in the American workforce was launched the day Obama became commander-in-chief, the administration drove home the point after the San Bernardino massacre by two Islamic terrorists. The new warning urges employers and employees to be particularly mindful of instances of harassment, intimidation or discrimination against Muslims and reminds businesses that accommodations for Muslim workers don’t just include time off for religious holidays but also “exceptions to dress and grooming codes.” Even if a situation does not amount to illegal harassment under federal law, the mandate asks employers to intervene in order to protect Muslim rights.

The document includes two attachments, in question-and-answer format, with hypothetical instances of discrimination. The first is geared towards employers and features two fictitious characters, Aliyyah and Susan, that encountered prejudice for their “religious attire.” An assistant manager at the store where Aliyyah applied to be a cashier believed her religious attire would make customers uncomfortable and Susan’s hijab violated an office dress code. Both instances constitute civil rights violations, according to the EEOC. The employer section also includes hypotheticals involving an Arab American named Muhammad and a Muslim named John who are harassed by colleagues about their religion.

The portion aimed at employees makes similar points with an added flare of drama. In that version the woman wearing the hijab was offered a bakery job over the phone but the manager appeared “startled” by her appearance and hired someone else. “In your situation, it appears that you were sent home because the employer had a negative reaction to your hijab, which you wear for religious reasons,” the new EEOC document asserts. A genderless Muslim character also complains about a coworker seeking “long discussions about Islam, ISIS and terrorism.” It’s possible the employer may not be helpful or might not see it as a problem at all, the EEOC concludes, encouraging Muslims that find themselves in these situations to file discrimination charges with the agency “at any time.”

Judicial Watch, Inc., a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law. Through its educational endeavors, Judicial Watch advocates high standards of ethics and morality in our nation’s public life and seeks to ensure that political and judicial officials do not abuse the powers entrusted to them by the American people. Judicial Watch fulfills its educational mission through litigation, investigations, and public outreach.

***

Recommended reading:

Religion In The Workplace: Guideline for Employers, Managers, Supervisors (amazon.com)

This excellent guideline for all types of companies and management personnel is a counter to the biased Council on American-Islamic Relations’ (CAIR) guideline on dealing with Moslem employees. The guideline quotes the CAIR piece and offers understanding of CAIR’s intent to intimidate and bully employers and managers with demands based on half-truths about Islam. The guideline is a practical, no-nonsense guide that employers and managers can use to avoid pitfalls and adverse legal actions. The author of the guideline has worked in Human Resources and has supervised multicultural workforces in both Western as well as Islamic cultures and knows his subject well. CAIR is an element of the colonizing Moslem Brotherhood of North America. CAIR has been identified by the Federal Bureau of Investigation as a terrorist based anti-American organization. As such, CAIR is biased and bigoted and works to bully those who are uninformed or unwise. This guideline seeks to inform and to provide wise and useful guidance.

A Twinge That Could Stop a Catastrophe

twinge of survival signal about islam (1)Citizen Warrior, Nov. 28, 2015:

In Gavin de Becker’s book, The Gift of Fear, he points out that many times a victim of rape intuitively knows something isn’t right — and sometimes knows it in time to do something about it — but the rapist often plays on her kindness, so she ignores her intuition, writes off her own twinge of fear as ridiculous because after all, he’s such a nice man.

One of the examples de Becker uses is a woman who was carrying groceries up the stairs to her apartment when a friendly man offered to help her. She had an immediate twinge of fear (what de Becker calls a “survival signal”) and she said, “No thank you.” But he insisted and when she hesitated because she didn’t want to hurt his feelings, he added a little “typecasting” to set the hook. Typecasting is one method manipulators use to influence people. It’s a slight insult designed to cause the victim to prove that the insult doesn’t apply to her, and in so doing, she makes herself more vulnerable. Read more about it here.

So she overrode her survival signal and accepted his help. She was raped in her apartment, and if it weren’t for the fact that she listened to her second twinge of fear, she would have been murdered that night.

There are orthodox Muslims who are using the same manipulative techniques with non-Muslim countries: Appealing to their kindness and typecasting them by implying that if they prevent Muslim immigration, they’re racist Islamophobes. Their goal is to get more Muslims into our non-Muslim countries. And as they gain a greater percentage of the population within our countries, they push for more and more concessions— getting the host culture to yield to Islamic standards one small increment at a time. This is what Raymond Ibrahim calls Islam’s rule of numbers.

As their numbers grow, their political power grows. Then politicians can no longer ignore this voting block and the push for concessions grows more insistent and demanding. The country is gradually converted to Islamic law.

Almost every non-Muslim country is on this track, yet still in a position to save itself, and some people within each country — more all the time — are listening to our survival signals.

Our twinges of intuition are correct: Islam swallows up cultures. In the end, nothing is left but Islam. That’s just what it does. Our twinge is a gift. A warning. Here’s the message, clarified into English: “Don’t let them in.”