BNP leader runs for office in Northern Virginia

Sharafat Hussain with Virginia Governor Ralph Northam.

 Asian Age, by Kyle Shideler, October 11, 2018:

Sharafat Hussain, Democratic candidate for Virginia State Senate District #33, seems like a model candidate for local politics. Like most local politicians, he’s an established presence with his county party, as fundraising chairman of the Loudoun County Democratic Committee and member of its executive council. Hussain also serves as vice-chair for the Leesburg District Democrats.

But unlike most local politicians, Hussain hasworrying international ties. In addition to being a Virginia Democrat, Hussain is identified as the US President of the Bangladeshi National Party (BNP) and the President of the Greater Washington BNP.
The Bangladeshi National Party is a sometimes violent nationalist Bangladeshi political party devoted to implementing an Islamic nationalism for Bangladesh. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security has previously argued in court that the BNP qualifies as a “Tier III” terrorist organization. Similar arguments have been made by Canadian authorities.
The BNP is the political ally of Jamaat-e-Islami, an Islamist political party whose armed wing, Hizbul Mujahedeen, was designated as a terrorist group by the U.S. State Department.
Hussain has been described in Bangladeshi news outlets as the brother-in-Law of BNP leader Tarique Rahman, who is wanted by the Bangladeshi government in connection with a 2004 grenade attack that killed 20 people.
Hussain is also editor and chief of the BNP’s international weekly newspaper, Weekly Bangladeshee. The paper publishes a mixture of information about recent BNP issues, politics, sports and entertainment news, along with items about Hussain’s campaign; including multiple posts which appear word-for-wordidenticalto articles posted on the campaign website. Additionally, Sharafat Hussain for Virginia lists the newspaper’s email address on his campaign signage.
The Virginia Department of Elections lists no campaign finance reports for the Friends of Sharafat Hussain campaign committee yet, so it’s unclear whether the cross-posting of campaign information at the BNP newspaper’s website is treated as an in-kind donation. The newspaper is a registered corporation in the state of Virginia, with Sharafat Hussain as its registered agent.
It’s not yet clear whether the BNP’s alliance with Islamists in Bangladesh influences Hussain’s approach to U.S. politics. In photos from his campaign website Hussain can be seen attending an event at the ADAMS Center, a Northern Virginia mosque linked to U.S. Islamist groups and raided by federal law enforcement in 2002 during a terrorism finance and money-laundering probe into the Safa Group, which federal agents alleged supported Islamic terror groups Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad.
Hussain attended the event with Jennifer Wexton, the current State Senator for Virginia District 33, who is running for the Congressional seat held by Rep. Barbara Comstock. The ADAMS Center has long exercised political influence in Northern Virginia, and both Democrats and Republicans have attended events there seeking to woo Muslims voters despite criticism regarding the mosque’s ties.
This is not the first time an individual with ties to the BNP has sought political office under the Democratic Party’s banner. In July of 2018, BNP activist Anis Ahmed failed to secure the democratic nomination for Maryland’s 15th District.
As concerns about foreign influence in U.S. electoral politics remain a hot-button issue, organized attempts by leading members of a foreign political party with a reputation for violence to secure political office raises concerns. Mr. Hussain needs to directly address his role in the BNP and explicitly reject any Islamist agenda for the United States; otherwise, voters should carefully consider whether they want to allow the representatives of political extremism into office.

Kyle Shideler is the Director of the Counter Islamist Grid (CIG), an initiative of the Middle East Forum

Terror in Paradise: Trinidad and Tobago Is Now a Jihad Hotspot

Getty Images

PJ Media, by  Todd Bensman, October 8, 2018:

The Ministry of Tourism for the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago hosts a website extolling the many exquisite charms of the “true Caribbean” to be found there. The islands offer rich history, culture, biodiversity, and lodging with views “to die for.”

Of late, though, a diaspora of Trinidad and Tobago emigres have preferred the views in Syria and Iraq, and the company of Islamic terrorist group ISIS. At least 130 of T&T’s 1.2 million citizens left their white and turquoise shorelines to fight with vicious Islamists half a world away. How did that happen? “Entire families went,” including at least 42 children, according to findings in a recent study by UK professor Simon Cottee of Kent University.

While the answer to how this pocket of Islamic terror developed is complex, now that ISIS is territorially defeated and its thousands of surviving foreign terrorist fighters are dispersing to all points, a more pressing question has arisen. What will T&T returnees and their sympathizing community do next without a pressing, defined cause like promulgating an ISIS caliphate?

The United Kingdom, which governed the tourist-heavy islands until their independence in 1976, has this to say on its “Foreign travel advice” website:

Terrorists are very likely to try to carry out attacks in Trinidad & Tobago. Attacks could be indiscriminate, including in crowded spaces and places visited by foreigners.

Closer to American interests and overland smuggling lanes to the U.S. Southern border, the United States and some of its allies in Latin America are worried about T&T, too.

Shia groups like Hezbollah, along with its sponsor the government of Iran, have long held criminal and intelligence footholds throughout South America, as I explained in a recent update on the subject. This has included Venezuela and its offshore island of Marguerite, about 150 nautical miles from Trinidad.

But Sunni extremists like ISIS? That’s a newer upward trend, as I wrote recentlywhen recounting a suspected plot by local ISIS sympathizers in Suriname, just around the coastal bend, to kill the U.S. ambassador in the former Dutch colony. Sizeable communities of South and Southeast Asian Muslim communities live in Suriname, Guyana, and Panama. A steady stream of migration from the Middle East dates to the early 2000s, attracted by free-trade zones in the region, according to the Jamestown Foundation and other sources. Visa-free travel is allowed throughout the Caribbean.

Trinidad & Tobago is a hotspot fitting the profile. Only about five percent of its population is Muslim, according to the CIA’s World Factbook. But this five percent are causing outsized global security concern. A hardline Sunni Islamist mosque and its imams have been accused of ginning up all kinds of trouble for decades. In 1990, a Muslim organization known as Jamaat al Muslimeen attempted a coup against the government. More than 40 Islamist insurgents stormed Parliament, taking the prime minister and most of his cabinet hostage for six days. In 2007, members of Jamaat al Muslimeen were tied to a plot to bomb New York’s JFK airport; one of its members was sentenced to life in prison.

The dark cloud has persisted, but U.S. security appears to be on top of the situation.

Earlier this year, troops with the U.S. Army’s Southern Command participated in anti-terror raids helping to capture four “high value targets” allegedly plotting to attack the annual “Carnival” celebrations. In 2017, Southern Command’s Admiral Kurt Tidd said: “Some of the individuals who left Trinidad-Tobago” have shown up “on film engaged in terrorist acts” and have committed murders in Syria. Even theNew York Times couldn’t ignore the developing threat from T&T’s jihadists, posting a story in 2017 citing American officials who fear “that Trinidadian fighters could return from the Middle East and attack American diplomatic and oil installations in Trinidad, or even take a three-and-a-half hour flight to Miami.”

Just last month, the U.S. Treasury Department showed that American security agencies remain on heightened alert. The Department listed two citizens of T&T on its terrorism sanctions list. It is now illegal for anyone or any entity to engage in transactions with dual U.S.-Trinidad citizen Emraan Ali and Trinidadian ISIS supporter Eddie Aleong. They join six other Trinidadian individuals or entities on the international sanctions list for terrorism involvement.

The Treasury Department accuses both men of working together to raise and send cash to Trinidadian ISIS fighters in the conflict zone. In 2015, Ali lived for a time at an ISIS guest house in Raqqah, Syria, the fallen ISIS caliphate “capital,” while Aleong is suspected of facilitating money transfers to ISIS as recently as March 2018.

According to local island press reports, the whereabouts of the 51-year-old Ali remain unknown since he and his wife departed to Syria several years ago. Ali married the daughter of an island imam recently interviewed by the Trinidad & Tobago Guardian. “I don’t get no information on them; I don’t know where they are,” said Imam Nazim Mohammed. Aleong is believed to still be in the area.

Islanders who joined ISIS are more of a concern than recruits from other countries, partly because they speak English. T&T nationals did “very well” in ISIS, former U.S. Ambassador John L. Estrada told the New York Times. “They are high up in the ranks, they are very respected, and they are English-speaking. ISIL have used them for propaganda to spread their message through the Caribbean.”

Issue 15 of the ISIS propaganda magazine Dabiq shows why it might be a problem if and when Trinidadian ISIS fighters come home. The magazine featured an interview with “Abu Sa’d al-Trinidadi,” a convert to Islam who had joined the group in Syria. He described how he and a small group of like-minded island co-religionists, after seeing the light, accumulated weapons, ammunition, and money to eventually “make hijrah” but also to be used in the meantime so that “whenever the disbelievers in Trinidad would kill or harm a Muslim, we would take revenge. … We were successful in many operations.” His wife was arrested at one point, apparently on suspicion of plotting to assassinate the prime minister and cabinet members, “but the police weren’t able to make a case against us.” He and two friends finally left for Syria after a delay to “exact revenge on two kafir criminals we were hunting,” an operation “carried out in the middle of the city in broad daylight and caught on camera.”

The U.S. government in recent years has pushed the island nation to do counterterrorism, according to a newly released U.S. State Department Countries Reports on Terrorism reflecting calendar year 2017.

“The threat from the possible return of foreign terrorist fighters remains a primary concern,” the report states, referring to T&T foreign terrorist fighters.

Also for the first time, in November 2017, the Trinidad and Tobago National Security Council approved a national counterterrorism strategy, and has shared intelligence with the United States.

Fingers crossed.

Lepanto, Tours, Columbus, and Vetting in the U.S. Government

Understanding the Threat, by John Gundadolo, October 8, 2018:

The Battles of Lepanto and Tours, Christopher Columbus, and America’s first war all have one thing in common – they all involved muslims waging jihad to enslave the entire world under Islam/sharia.

Yet, the U.S. government continues to give sharia-adherent muslims security clearances, positions in our government, and military training.

The Battle of Lepanto, October 7, 1571

On October 7, 1571, the naval forces of the Holy League met the Islamic Ottoman Turks in the Gulf of Corinth (Greece) and – after prayer by the entire Holy League and many churches around Europe – the Ottomans were defeated for the first time by Christian forces in a naval battle, now referred to as the Battle of Lepanto.

Read a more detailed account of the Battle of Lepanto by UTT here.

In the Battle of Tours (October 10, 732), Charles “The Hammer” Martel led the forces of Europe against the Islamic forces of the Umayyad Caliphate, and were victorious against the muslims.  This was a tremendous, and some say miraculous, victory for the Christian West against the Islamic forces.

On October 8th of each year America celebrates “Columbus Day.”

Christopher Columbus was commissioned by his queen in 1492 to discover new islands and lands.  Why in that year?

1492 was the year Spanish forces came down from the mountains of Spain, defeated the muslim forces, pushed them out, and took back their homeland which had been seized by muslims for approximately 780 years.

The first war America fought after the American Revolution was against muslims who seized U.S. ships on the high seas, captured Americans, and charged the United States great sums of money as tribute.

Specifically, President Thomas Jefferson sent the Marines to Tripoli in 1804 to defeat the muslims.   The English translation of the Koran Jefferson obtained encouraged readers to study it so the Islamic enemy could be understood and defeated in battle.

U.S. Marine Lieutenant Presley O’Bannon at Derna, Tripoli

Today, the government of the United States continues to employ sharia-adherent muslims in positions of authority inside our government, use them to advise U.S. officials on matters of national security, and allows hostile foreign powers to attend U.S. war colleges, military training programs, and much more.

Three examples:

  1. Abdurahman Alamoudi was the Islamic advisor the President Clinton and met with him more than any other muslim in America.  Alamoudi was a “Goodwill Ambassador” for the U.S. State Department and founded the Muslim Chaplain Program for the Department of Defense.  Alamoudi is now in federal prison and was an Al Qaeda financier.
  2. On 9/11/01, Suhail Khan was working inside the White House, and then became a close advisor to two successive Secretaries of Transportation with a clearance.  Khan is the son of one of the most prominent U.S. Muslim Brotherhood leaders in the 1960’s and 1970’s, Mahboob Khan.  Suhail Khan lauded his fathers efforts and was publicly praised by Al Qaeda financier Alamoudi.
  3. Gulmurod Khalimov participated in five (5) U.S. State Department training programs which included weapons and tactics training between 2003 and 2014.  During this time period, videos were available online where Khalimov – a jihadi commander in Tajikistan at the time – called for killing Americans.  Khalimov then became the “Minister of War for ISIS.”  The State Department defended their training of Khalimov by stating Khalimov had been appropriately vetted.

Al Qaeda financier Abdurahman Alamoudi with President Bill Clinton in the White House

All Islamic doctrine mandates warfare against non-muslims until the war is under Islamic rule.

All Islamic doctrine mandates that muslims lie to non-muslims if it advances Islam.

Previous generations of Patriots whose minds were not polluted by the inability to see good and evil could make clear-headed decisions about the true nature of Islam.

Pretending the wolf is a puppy, does not keep the wolf from eating you.

U.S. Is Top Target as ISIS Terror Plots Soar

Getty Images

Washington Free Beacon, by Adam Kredo, October 5, 2018:

The United States has emerged as the terror group ISIS’s top target, with 30 percent of the group’s recent plots centering on America, including 33 terror attempts in just the first part of 2018, according to a new congressional report.

ISIS-backed terrorists have attempted to launch at least 73 attacks on the American homeland since 2017, according to a comprehensive report released Friday by the House Homeland Security Committee.

ISIS continues to be the preeminent terror faction across the globe and is linked to 142 plots, including arrest and attacks targeting Westerners over the past two years, according to the report. ISIS has been tied to a total of 243 terror plots since 2014, or about “five terrorist incidents per month” according to the report.

There is no sign ISIS terror plots are on the decline, according to the report, which found a 63 percent increase in ISIS terrorism during the past two years.

The plots include those organized by at least 22 teenagers, as well as refugees and asylum seekers, a statistic that could provide the Trump administration further ammunition as it seeks to limit the number of refugees permitted into America from Middle East hotspots.

ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, after a period of silence, has appeared back on the grid encouraging followers to strike America and its allies.

Baghdadi, in a recent speech reviewed by the committee, “not only offered definitive proof he is still alive—citing recent tensions between the United States and Turkey—he downplayed ISIS’ territorial losses and emphasized the importance of homeland attacks in the West to the overall strategy and long-term success of ISIS.”

“Carry out an attack that breaks their heart, and rip them apart, either with gunfire, or a stab to their bodies, or a bombing in their countries, for this is equal to a thousand operations here,” Baghdadi was quoted as saying in an August 2018 speech marking his return to the public forefront. “Do not forget about running people over on the roads. Ignite your fight, so that Crusaders will feel its flames.”

As the Trump administration targets ISIS in Iraq, Syria, and other countries—devastating the group and wrenching from it control of key territories—ISIS has shown that it can still organize terror attacks abroad, particularly in the United States and European nations.

“Since the summer of 2014, when the Islamic State declared its self-proclaimed caliphate and Baghdadi appeared at the al-Nuri mosque in Mosul, Iraq, to declare himself the ‘Caliph Ibrahim,’ ISIS has lost nearly 98 percent of the territory it controlled in Iraq and Syria,” the report noted.

“Most of these losses have occurred over the last two years, but despite its setbacks, ISIS and its adherents have been linked to 142 incidents—arrests, plots, and attacks—targeting Westerners or the West over the last two years,” the report states.

“That compares to 101 ISIS-linked incidents reported in House Homeland’s ‘Terror Gone Viral’ report released in 2016,” according to the report. “Cumulatively, over the 2014 to 2018 period covered by the Terror Gone Viral reports, ISIS has been linked to 243 incidences, averaging five terrorist incidents per month.”

ISIS continues to recruit followers via online websites and social networking applications.

The report’s findings show “that despite ISIS’ battlefield losses, the group remains a potent threat in large part due to the viral success of its online propaganda and ‘how to’ efforts,” the report warns.

Also see:

Daily Reality, Islamic Doctrine & 1400 Years of History Tell Us There is ONE Version of Islam

Understanding the Threat, by John Guandolo, October 3, 2018:

Headlines from around the world demonstrate Islamic leaders and sharia-adherent muslims want to live under sharia, want everyone else to live under sharia, believe those who leave Islam must be killed, believe raping non-muslims is lawful, believe warfare against non-muslims is mandatory until the world is under Islamic rule, believe mosques are centers of the Islamic government where sharia is adjudicated and weapons are stored, and believe Islam must dominate, subjugate, and eradicate.

Here are a few stories from around the world in the LAST 3 days:

  • Grandson of 1972 Munich Massacre architect (terrorist) who is running for U.S. Congress in California called a “Security Risk”
  • Man who applied for refugee status in Poland numerous times expelled for ties to terrorist organizations
  • Canada Revenue Agency fines Islamic Society of North America over concerns it aided armed jihadis
  • Sharia Law, Islamic Jihadis Rule Greece’s Notorious Migrant Camp
  • Jihadi on trial in Australia says muslims must wage jihad, martyrdom is the goal, and sharia is the law
  • French police raid a Shi’ite Muslim mosque and arrest three of its leaders for illegal weapons possession
  • France accuses Iranian Intelligence of working inside France to support jihadi attacks
  • 3 muslims from the West Bank indicted for plotting terrorism (jihad) against Israel
  • Brandeis University in Massachusetts to fund projects countering “Islamophobia”
  • Muslims slaughter 17 Christians in Nigeria
  • Muslims in Greek Refugee Camp openly state “If you are not Muslim I can rape you”
  • Spanish Police take down jihadi recruiting operation in 17 prisons
  • 70 muslims in rape gang in Telford, England raped a 13 year old girl 6 years ago – only one was recently convicted
  • Islamic scholar says Female Genital Mutilation is recommended for muslim girls/females
  • Several muslim “refugees” caught/arrested at the Oktoberfest in Munich for sexually assaulting women
  • 13 dead, over 30 injured in martyrdom operation (bombing) by muslim in Afghanistan

Strange how so many muslims are getting their “version” of Islam “wrong” in the exact same way.  Maybe they aren’t getting it wrong.

Just like the most prominent Islamic scholars from Al Azhar who believe in the same “version” of Islam as Al Qaeda and the Islamic State scholars.

Strange how Abdullah Azzam, who created Al Qaeda with Osama bin Laden, and Al Qaeda’s Blind Sheikh (Omar Abdel Rahman) believed in the same “version” of Islam too.  Yet, they were revered Islamic scholars.

Strange how today we can find the books and DVD’s of Al Qaeda leader Anwar al Awlaqi in nearly every mosque book store in America teaching the same “version” of Islam, yet the United States killed him in a drone strike in 2011.

There is 1 Islam and 1 sharia

The following is lawful under sharia:

  • Killing those who leave Islam
  • Killing those who commit adultery
  • Killing homosexuals
  • Waging war against/Killing non-muslims who do not convert or submit to sharia
  • Lying to non-muslims
  • Raping women who do not cover themselves
  • Female Genital Mutilation
  • A 60 year old man marrying a 7 year old girl
  • Parents killing their children or grand-children

Creating a domestic counter-terrorism strategy in the United States, a military war-plan to be victorious over the Islamic threat, and a foreign policy to support that war-plan, must begin with knowing and understanding that Islam is at war with the United States and, therefore, we are at war.

Islam is the threat.  Sharia is the doctrine.

The first war America fought after the American Revolution was against muslims from the Islamic States (Barbary States) waging war against the United States by seizing U.S. ships and capturing our citizens.

President Thomas Jefferson went to war against the Islamic States because he understood they were the enemy of liberty and an enemy of the United States.  Twenty years earlier he and John Adams heard it from the Ambassador to Britain from Tripoli who told them muslims had the right to wage war against non-muslims because the Koran says so.

When the United States decides to read the enemy’s war doctrine (sharia), commit to a plan for victory based on a professional analysis of the enemy’s doctrine (sharia), and stop taking advice from muslims, we will win this war.

New White House Counterterrorism Strategy Singles Out ‘Radical Islamists’

National Security Adviser John Bolton / Getty Images

Washington Free Beacon, by Adam Kredo, October 4, 2018:

The Trump administration is implementing a new, government-wide counterterrorism strategy that places renewed focus on combatting “radical Islamic terrorist groups,” marking a significant departure from the Obama administration, which implemented a series of policies aimed at deemphasizing the threat of Islamic terror groups.

In releasing the first national counterterrorism strategy since 2011, the Trump administration is working to take a drastically different approach than that of the former administration, according to senior U.S. officials.

While the Obama administration sought to dampen the United States’ focus on Islamic terror threats, the Trump administration has made this battle the centerpiece of its new strategy.

National Security Adviser John Bolton acknowledged in remarks to reporters Thursday afternoon that the new strategy is “a departure” from the former administration’s strategy, which has been characterized as a failure by Republican foreign policy voices due to the increasing number of domestic terror attacks and plots across the United States

“Radical Islamist terrorist groups represent the preeminent transnational terrorist threat to the United States, and to United States’ interests abroad,” Bolton said.

“The fact is the radical Islamic threat that we face is a form of ideology,” Bolton said. “This should not be anything new to anybody. King Abdullah of Jordan has frequently described the terrorist threat as a civil war within Islam that Muslims around the world recognize, and he is, after all, a direct descendent of the Sharif [inaudible], the keepers of the holy cities. If that’s how King Abdullah views it, I don’t think anybody should be surprised we see it as a kind of war, as well.”

“One may hope that the ideological fervor disappears, but sad to report, it remains strong all around the world, and even with the defeat of the ISIS territorial caliphate, we see the threat spreading to other countries,” Bolton added.

The Trump administration strategy also shifts the focus to Iran, characterizing the country as the foremost state sponsor of terror across the globe.

“The United States faces terrorist threats from Iran, which remains the most prominent state sponsor of terrorism that, really, the world’s central banker of international terrorism since 1979,” Bolton said. “And from other terrorist groups. Iran-sponsored terrorist groups such as Lebanese Hezbollah, Hamas, and Palestinian Islamic jihad, continue to pose a threat to the United States and our interests.”

The focus on Iran also represents a striking departure from the Obama administration’s strategy, which sought to moderate Iran via the landmark nuclear deal and other diplomacy aimed at rewarding the Islamic Republic for moderation efforts.

The United States will also take greater steps to pursue “terrorists at their source” by destroying them militarily, as well as with international sanctions aimed at choking off their funding.

Additionally, it focuses on “protecting U.S. infrastructure and enhancing preparedness, countering terrorist radicalization and recruitment and strengthening the counterterrorism abilities of our international partners,” according to the White House.

President Trump, in discussing the new strategy, also emphasized efforts to counter Iran.

“I ended United States participation in the horrible Iran deal, which had provided a windfall for the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and its proxies, funding Iran’s malign activities throughout the world,” Trump said.

In outlining what it calls “a new approach,” the White House said it would actively combat “all terrorists with the intent and ability to harm our country.” This includes both a military prong and other efforts to counter the spread of radical ideologies.

“America First does not mean America alone,” the White House said in a preview of the full strategy guide. “The new strategy commits us to expand our partnerships at home and abroad to encourage partners’ assistance in counterterrorism activities,” including with NATO and other allies.

Kavanaugh Hearing Highlights Dangerous Marxist/Jihadist Counter-State Operations

Understanding  the Threat, by John Guandolo, October 2, 2019:

The ongoing assault on Justice Brett Kavanaugh highlights a concerted and dangerous intentional effort by the Marxist and Islamic counter-states operating inside the U.S. like dueling cancers to destroy us from within.

Protester from Kavanaugh Hearing being paid off by her Marxist handler

An agitator from the Marxist/George Soros funded Code Pink (a group that supports the terrorist group Hamas) protests the Justice Kavanaugh nomination

This war is primarily being waged in the information realm and the enemy’s tools include propaganda, subversion, influence operations, political warfare, and similar lines of operation to intentionally undermine the Republic and bring it down from the inside.

This means those people engaged in this cannot be considered “nice” people with “differing opinions.”  They are hostile to our legal and political systems and are waging a systematic assault on our founding principles and our way of life.

Working in tandem, the Marxist and Islamic counter-states oppose everything that provides a foundation and protection for the United States.

It is the Marxists, led by the leadership of the Democrat party, who opposed President Trump in his desire to shut down immigration from nations hostile to America.  Collaborating with their terrorist/jihadi allies from the Muslim Brotherhood’s Muslim Association of Hawaii and a federal judge, Democrats (Marxists) thwarted the President of the United States in this efforts to protect the American people.

Have you wondered by President Trump’s effort to designate the Muslim Brotherhood a Foreign Terrorist Organization has failed thus far?

The leadership of the International Muslim Brotherhood’s admitted in February 2017 to a coordinated information operation directed against the U.S. Congress and the American people assisted by Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation’s Director in Egypt, Gehad El-Haddad.

El-Haddad was the Egyptian Director for the Clinton Foundation from August 2007 through August 2012.

Gehad El-Haddad is also the jailed Spokesman for the International Muslim Brotherhood and was the spokesman for the Muslim Brotherhood’s candidate who became Egyptian President Morsi.

Jailed Spokesman for the International Muslim Brotherhood & former Director of the Clinton Foundation in Egypt Gehad El-Haddad

You cannot make this stuff up.

Just like the “nuclear freeze protests” of the 1980’s – which were funded by the KGB and their communist surrogates all over the world – the events unfolding today are being coordinated and intentionally executed by individuals and organizations hostile to the United States with the purpose of bringing America down.

This means these individuals and organizations are waging war against the United States and, therefore, should be not be considered “political opponents” but hostile entities in a war for the survival of the Republic.